 |
 |
|
 |
| |
Background |
|
|
| |
Since the base closure in 1995, the
US Navy has been going through the process of identifying and remediating
residual contamination from its historical operations as a fuel
depot. Numerous studies have clearly identified the areas of the
Site affected by petroleum compounds, and in some instances, small
areas of other contaminants, and the Navy has remediated many of
the areas on the Site. Each of the 20 approximately 2-million-gallon
fuel tanks have been cleaned and closed by the Navy, the on-site
landfill has been capped, sand blast grit areas excavated, and surface
oil impoundments excavated and disposed of at approved off-site
landfills. Environmental closure of most of the storage tanks (monitoring
and remediation of usually small contaminated areas around each
tank) is underway.
Draft feasibility studies and risk assessments have been completed
by the Navy for remaining areas of the Site; however, the State
of California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and the
Navy have yet to come to agreement on cleanup approach for the large
oil sump area (IR Site 3) and Drum Lot 2. The Navy’s studies
have concluded that these areas do not pose a significant risk to
health or the environment. RWQCB policies favor a more aggressive
cleanup approach. Given budgetary constraints and concerns over
precedent, the Navy has indicated it would not undertake an aggressive
cleanup of these areas, taking a wait-and-see approach to verify
if existing residual contamination will migrate to San Francisco
Bay. Although this approach may or may not pose a long-term environmental
problem, it would delay any public use of the Site would be delayed
for many years, even decades. |

Colored areas show portions of the Site still undergoing cleanup
evaluations or monitoring. Most of these areas are still owned
by the Navy. |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Early
Transfer Process
Given its desire to implement the goals of the Base Reuse Plan and
acquire the remaining approximately 50 acres still owned by the
Navy, the City of Richmond requested an Early Transfer of those
parcels in 2005. Early transfer negotiations between City staff,
representatives of Upstream, and the Navy have been ongoing since
then. In April 2008, these negotiations reached a breakthrough.
The parties agreed on a strategy for a more aggressive cleanup
on the remaining parcels using a combination of funding from the
Navy and Upstream Point Molate LLC/Guidiville Band of Pomo Indians.
The result of this pending agreement will be a more rapid and complete
cleanup of the Site than would be possible under Navy ownership.
Assuming no significant process delays, cleanup would be completed
in 2010.
Under the early transfer strategy, the City and Upstream/Guidiville
will complete remediation plans, implement remediation, and conduct
long-term monitoring for the property. Under the pending agreement,
the Navy will transfer the deed for the remaining approximately
50 acres to the City of Richmond along with a funding package of
$28.5 million by early 2009. Upstream/Guidiville will provide
additional funds for the difference between the Navy approach and
the cost estimate for the more aggressive cleanup proposed. The
Navy’s funding package will also provide for comprehensive
environmental insurance to cover the City, Upstream/Guidiville,
and the federal government for cost overruns and third-party liabilities
arising from residual contamination on the property. Upstream/Guidiville’s
contribution will cover insurance deductibles.
The City/Upstream/Guidiville cleanup approach was presented to
the City’s citizen Restoration Advisory Board (RAB) on June
4, 2008, and received a favorable response. Under the plan presented
by Upstream/Guidiville, the RAB would continue to provide citizen
oversight of cleanup activities even after the Site is transferred
from the Navy to the City.
Upstream/City Plan for Site Remediation
The current Land Disposition Agreement (LDA) calls for Upstream
to manage and undertake required cleanup obligations once the property
is transferred. Navy funds will go to a City-established escrow
from which Upstream will receive funds as needed to complete the
cleanup. Under the pending agreement, the City receives reimbursement
for its costs to-date and for future oversight. The City will be
named as discharger under a new RWQCB Board Order. Upstream/Guidiville
will transition to the primary discharger under the Order when the
property is transferred. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Regulatory and
Site Remediation Status Summary
The following summarizes regulatory and remediation status for the
major operational units on the Site:
- IR Site 1 – Landfill and IR Site 2 – Sand Blast
Grit Areas: Signed Record of Decision.
- IR Site 1 – Landfill: Post-Closure Monitoring and Maintenance
Plan to be transitioned to City/Upstream/Guidiville.
- IR Site 3 – Oil Sump Pond Area: Significant petroleum
compounds remain in the ground. Draft remediation documents have
been submitted by Navy, but not approved by RWQCB. City proposes
aggressive cleanup here.
- IR Site 4 – Drum Lot 1: Navy risk assessment submitted
indicates no significant risk. Monitoring and soil management
plan are recommended.
- IR Site 4 – Drum Lot 2: Navy risk assessment submitted
indicates no significant risk due to small area of volatile organic
compounds (VOCs). City proposes aggressive cleanup here as well.
- Corrective Action Plan already implemented for underground
storage tanks and pipelines. Remaining environmental closure of
13 tanks to be completed by the City/Upstream/Guidiville.
Detailed Discussion of IR Site 3 – Oil Sump Area
From 1940s to 1974, IR Site 3 was a disposal area for contaminated
fuel, pond bottoms, and other liquids. Disposal of these materials
occurred during filling of this area with approximately 20 feet
of fill on top of the existing Bay Mud. Soil mixed with oily waste
in the sump during backfilling created the “fuel saturated
soils” present throughout this area. From 1974 to 2003, the
sump pond was filled and unlined wastewater treatment ponds constructed
on top. These conditions caused petroleum seepage along the shoreline
of San Francisco Bay, and necessitated remediation along the Bay
beginning in 1995.
IR Site 3 – Sump Area Remediation To Date
The conditions described above created two main environmental risks:
- Direct contact between site users and residual petroleum.
- Migration of free-phase petroleum to San Francisco Bay creating
a sheen.
The Navy previously excavated the surface oily waste impoundments
and disposed of those soils at an off-site approved landfill, however
underlying soils within the water table were not remediated. Currently,
risks are managed through land use controls and a groundwater capture
and extraction system. The groundwater capture system includes a
1,100-foot sheetpile containment wall and 12 extraction wells, which
remove fuel on the groundwater as it migrates toward the shoreline.
Extracted water is treated in an on-site system and then discharged
under permit. Although studies have shown no significant dissolved
petroleum in groundwater, free-phase heavy fuel is still present
in portions of IR Site 3 soils, both above and below the water table.
|

Colored areas show portions of the Site still undergoing cleanup
evaluations or monitoring. Most of these areas are still owned
by the Navy. |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |

IR Site 3 ponds received oily waste
for 50 years |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
IR Site 3
– City/Upstream/Guidiville Program Proposes Aggressive Cleanup
Approach
Although the Navy proposed removing only a small area of affected
soils below the water table and monitoring the area for 10 years,
the City and Upstream/Guidiville are developing an aggressive cleanup
plan that would include the following elements:
- Remove shallow soils to residential cleanup standards (3 feet
below ground surface [bgs]) and deeper soils up to 10 feet bgs
to commercial cleanup standards.
- Remove fuel-saturated soils throughout IR Site 3 where free
product has been observed in monitoring wells.
- Remove soils 100-feet upgradient from groundwater containment
system to the underlying Bay Mud (approximately 20 feet bgs).
- Backfill the excavation with clean and sorptive material to
provide added contingency.
- Breach sheetpile to allow water to flow at bottom of the wall.
- Conduct long-term monitoring along the shoreline.
Specific remediation plans and design documents would be submitted
to the RWQCB under a new cleanup order. Public participation by
the RAB and the public at-large would be included in the plan prior
to formal acceptance by the RWQCB.
|
|
| |
| |
|

Upstream/Guidiville plan will excavate soils in upper
10 feet within the shaded areas that exceed cleanup goals |
|

Upstream/Guidiville plan will excavate soils below
10 feet along the entire shoreline and where mobile product
is present |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| Detailed Discussion of
IR Site 4 – Drum Lot 2
Drum storage activities on this 30-acre area left a small
area of chlorinated VOCs in soil and groundwater. Because
of the relatively low concentrations in the groundwater (up
to several hundred parts per billion of trichloroethylene
[TCE]), the Navy’s risk assessment concluded no significant
risk to the public or the Bay, and therefore recommended No
Further Action. RWQCB policies favor source removal where
it is feasible. Under the early transfer program, the City
and Upstream/Guidiville are developing an aggressive cleanup
plan to remediate TCE in soil and groundwater. Source soils
would be removed and groundwater treated in-place to eliminate
any significant future environmental or health risk.
Residual pesticide contamination adjacent to nearby Building
87 and residual sand blast grit in the area were previously
removed by the Navy.
Underground Tanks
The Navy has completed structural closure of all of the underground
tanks (cleaning, capping of lines, etc.) and is undergoing
regulatory closure and sign-off regarding soil conditions.
Approximately one-third of the tanks are now fully closed.
Remaining closures will be completed in 2009. |

VOC-affected soils will be excavated and affected groundwater
treated in the Drum Lot 2 area |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| Continued
Role for Citizens’ Restoration Advisory Board
The Richmond RAB has been asked to continue to help oversee
site remediation, and continue as the public’s link
between cleanup efforts and the City. Upstream/Guidiville
has also invited the RAB to participate in developing a site
ecological restoration plan over the next two years. |

Underground storage tanks will continue to be closed in-place
and long-term monitoring will continue |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|