 |
 |
|
 |
| |
Background |
|
|
| |
Since the base closure in 1995, the US Navy
has been going through the process of identifying and remediating residual
contamination from its historical operations as a fuel depot. Numerous
studies have clearly identified the areas of the Site affected by petroleum
compounds, and in some instances, small areas of other contaminants, and
the Navy has remediated many of the areas on the Site. Each of the 20
approximately 2-million-gallon fuel tanks have been cleaned and closed
by the Navy, the on-site landfill has been capped, sand blast grit areas
excavated, and surface oil impoundments excavated and disposed of at approved
off-site landfills. Environmental closure of most of the storage tanks
(monitoring and remediation of usually small contaminated areas around
each tank) is underway.
Draft feasibility studies and risk assessments have been completed by
the Navy for remaining areas of the Site; however, the State of California
Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and the Navy have yet to
come to agreement on cleanup approach for the large oil sump area (IR
Site 3) and Drum Lot 2. The Navy’s studies have concluded that these
areas do not pose a significant risk to health or the environment. RWQCB
policies favor a more aggressive cleanup approach. Given budgetary constraints
and concerns over precedent, the Navy has indicated it would not undertake
an aggressive cleanup of these areas, taking a wait-and-see approach to
verify if existing residual contamination will migrate to San Francisco
Bay. Although this approach may or may not pose a long-term environmental
problem, it would delay any public use of the Site would be delayed for
many years, even decades. |

Colored areas show portions of the Site still undergoing cleanup evaluations
or monitoring. Most of these areas are still owned by the Navy. |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Early
Transfer Process
Given its desire to implement the goals of the Base Reuse Plan and acquire
the remaining approximately 50 acres still owned by the Navy, the City
of Richmond requested an Early Transfer of those parcels in 2005. Early
transfer negotiations between City staff, representatives of Upstream,
and the Navy have been ongoing since then. In April 2008, these negotiations
reached a breakthrough. The parties agreed on a strategy for a
more aggressive cleanup on the remaining parcels using a combination of
funding from the Navy and Upstream Point Molate LLC/Guidiville Band of
Pomo Indians. The result of this pending agreement will be a more rapid
and complete cleanup of the Site than would be possible under Navy ownership.
Assuming no significant process delays, cleanup would be completed in
2010.
Under the early transfer strategy, the City and Upstream/Guidiville will
complete remediation plans, implement remediation, and conduct long-term
monitoring for the property. Under the pending agreement, the Navy will
transfer the deed for the remaining approximately 50 acres to the City
of Richmond along with a funding package of $28.5 million by early 2009.
Upstream/Guidiville will provide additional funds for the difference
between the Navy approach and the cost estimate for the more aggressive
cleanup proposed. The Navy’s funding package will also provide for
comprehensive environmental insurance to cover the City, Upstream/Guidiville,
and the federal government for cost overruns and third-party liabilities
arising from residual contamination on the property. Upstream/Guidiville’s
contribution will cover insurance deductibles.
The City/Upstream/Guidiville cleanup approach was presented to the City’s
citizen Restoration Advisory Board (RAB) on June 4, 2008, and received
a favorable response. Under the plan presented by Upstream/Guidiville,
the RAB would continue to provide citizen oversight of cleanup activities
even after the Site is transferred from the Navy to the City.
Upstream/City Plan for Site Remediation
The current Land Disposition Agreement (LDA) calls for Upstream to manage
and undertake required cleanup obligations once the property is transferred.
Navy funds will go to a City-established escrow from which Upstream will
receive funds as needed to complete the cleanup. Under the pending agreement,
the City receives reimbursement for its costs to-date and for future oversight.
The City will be named as discharger under a new RWQCB Board Order. Upstream/Guidiville
will transition to the primary discharger under the Order when the property
is transferred. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Regulatory and Site
Remediation Status Summary
The following summarizes regulatory and remediation status for the major
operational units on the Site:
- IR Site 1 – Landfill and IR Site 2 – Sand Blast Grit
Areas: Signed Record of Decision.
- IR Site 1 – Landfill: Post-Closure Monitoring and Maintenance
Plan to be transitioned to City/Upstream/Guidiville.
- IR Site 3 – Oil Sump Pond Area: Significant petroleum compounds
remain in the ground. Draft remediation documents have been submitted
by Navy, but not approved by RWQCB. City proposes aggressive cleanup
here.
- IR Site 4 – Drum Lot 1: Navy risk assessment submitted indicates
no significant risk. Monitoring and soil management plan are recommended.
- IR Site 4 – Drum Lot 2: Navy risk assessment submitted indicates
no significant risk due to small area of volatile organic compounds
(VOCs). City proposes aggressive cleanup here as well.
- Corrective Action Plan already implemented for underground storage
tanks and pipelines. Remaining environmental closure of 13 tanks to
be completed by the City/Upstream/Guidiville.
Detailed Discussion of IR Site 3 – Oil Sump Area
From 1940s to 1974, IR Site 3 was a disposal area for contaminated fuel,
pond bottoms, and other liquids. Disposal of these materials occurred
during filling of this area with approximately 20 feet of fill on top
of the existing Bay Mud. Soil mixed with oily waste in the sump during
backfilling created the “fuel saturated soils” present throughout
this area. From 1974 to 2003, the sump pond was filled and unlined wastewater
treatment ponds constructed on top. These conditions caused petroleum
seepage along the shoreline of San Francisco Bay, and necessitated remediation
along the Bay beginning in 1995.
IR Site 3 – Sump Area Remediation To Date
The conditions described above created two main environmental risks:
- Direct contact between site users and residual petroleum.
- Migration of free-phase petroleum to San Francisco Bay creating a
sheen.
The Navy previously excavated the surface oily waste impoundments and
disposed of those soils at an off-site approved landfill, however underlying
soils within the water table were not remediated. Currently, risks are
managed through land use controls and a groundwater capture and extraction
system. The groundwater capture system includes a 1,100-foot sheetpile
containment wall and 12 extraction wells, which remove fuel on the groundwater
as it migrates toward the shoreline. Extracted water is treated in an
on-site system and then discharged under permit. Although studies have
shown no significant dissolved petroleum in groundwater, free-phase heavy
fuel is still present in portions of IR Site 3 soils, both above and below
the water table. |

Colored areas show portions of the Site still undergoing cleanup evaluations
or monitoring. Most of these areas are still owned by the Navy. |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |

IR Site 3 ponds received oily waste
for 50 years |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
IR Site 3 –
City/Upstream/Guidiville Program Proposes Aggressive Cleanup Approach
Although the Navy proposed removing only a small area of affected soils
below the water table and monitoring the area for 10 years, the City and
Upstream/Guidiville are developing an aggressive cleanup plan that would
include the following elements:
- Remove shallow soils to residential cleanup standards (3 feet below
ground surface [bgs]) and deeper soils up to 10 feet bgs to commercial
cleanup standards.
- Remove fuel-saturated soils throughout IR Site 3 where free product
has been observed in monitoring wells.
- Remove soils 100-feet upgradient from groundwater containment system
to the underlying Bay Mud (approximately 20 feet bgs).
- Backfill the excavation with clean and sorptive material to provide
added contingency.
- Breach sheetpile to allow water to flow at bottom of the wall.
- Conduct long-term monitoring along the shoreline.
Specific remediation plans and design documents would be submitted to
the RWQCB under a new cleanup order. Public participation by the RAB and
the public at-large would be included in the plan prior to formal acceptance
by the RWQCB.
|
|
| |
| |
|

Upstream/Guidiville plan will excavate soils in upper 10 feet
within the shaded areas that exceed cleanup goals |
|

Upstream/Guidiville plan will excavate soils below
10 feet along the entire shoreline and where mobile product
is present |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| Detailed Discussion of IR Site
4 – Drum Lot 2
Drum storage activities on this 30-acre area left a small area of
chlorinated VOCs in soil and groundwater. Because of the relatively
low concentrations in the groundwater (up to several hundred parts
per billion of trichloroethylene [TCE]), the Navy’s risk assessment
concluded no significant risk to the public or the Bay, and therefore
recommended No Further Action. RWQCB policies favor source removal
where it is feasible. Under the early transfer program, the City
and Upstream/Guidiville are developing an aggressive cleanup plan
to remediate TCE in soil and groundwater. Source soils would be
removed and groundwater treated in-place to eliminate any significant
future environmental or health risk.
Residual pesticide contamination adjacent to nearby Building 87
and residual sand blast grit in the area were previously removed
by the Navy.
Underground Tanks
The Navy has completed structural closure of all of the underground
tanks (cleaning, capping of lines, etc.) and is undergoing regulatory
closure and sign-off regarding soil conditions. Approximately one-third
of the tanks are now fully closed. Remaining closures will be completed
in 2009. |

VOC-affected soils will be excavated and affected groundwater
treated in the Drum Lot 2 area |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| Continued Role
for Citizens’ Restoration Advisory Board
The Richmond RAB has been asked to continue to help oversee site
remediation, and continue as the public’s link between cleanup
efforts and the City. Upstream/Guidiville has also invited the RAB
to participate in developing a site ecological restoration plan
over the next two years. |

Underground storage tanks will continue to be closed in-place
and long-term monitoring will continue |
|
|
|
| |
|
|